Page 1 of 1
Rotax 582 vs 912
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:11 am
by Smiley
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:50 am
by Sonex711
Another advantage I see is the TBO of the 912 is 1500 hours vs 300 for a 582.
Also, 4-strokes tend to be a bit more reliable

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:15 pm
by Smiley
Thanks guys!! :D
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:09 pm
by zoobie
hey guys...I can only speak from a fixed wing perspective....A Bushie with a normal 912 (80hp) performs less than a Bushie with a 582...reason, weight.
However, if you talking 912S (100hp).....then it is a completeley different matter....those extra 20 ponies make a huge difference..
also only my 2 cents worth.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:33 pm
by Smiley
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:03 pm
by Junkie
the 912 makes for a more stable Bushbaby all round - but wont out climb the 582, unless you put in the 912s, but then you end up with more worries in the temp dept
912 seems an even match for best climb and best glide speeds at around 65mph with about 500fpm full tanks (72l) and pax, cruising at 80mph 4800rpm with no worries on overheating most times. Darn engine mounts are crappy though
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:08 pm
by Griffin
Junkie wrote:the 912 makes for a more stable Bushbaby all round
Stable from what aspect?
912 is areal engine
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:20 am
by ZULU1
No debate, the 912 has proven to be a top piece of kit, my 582 cost the same as a 912 cos you keep adding cranks...works out the same in the long run. 350hrs tbwh (time before wallet hurt) versus 912 goes on forever.
Matter closed.
Paul
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 10:24 pm
by Cali
OK so what is the price difference between a new 582 and a new 912???
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:42 am
by tdrtw
Here is a link that pertains to this topic:
http://www.ultralightnews.ca/articles/912vs582.html
Cheers,
Damien
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:15 am
by Cali
Point taken thanks :D