Microlight Weight

Discussion of all official legislative, legal, licencing and operating matters

Moderator: John Boucher

User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Microlight Weight

Postby skybound® » Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:59 pm

The 450kg still stays from what I can see in 24.01.2.E2 (2) BUT the 'massaging' of weight has been closed off with the way in which the max take off weight is to be calculated.

Basically the formula accordig to the new regulations for a 2 seater is:
MTOW=Empty weight + 2 Pax @ 84 kgs each + 22kg for fuel.

So any 2 seater aircraft with an empty weight more than 260kgs will fall into aeroplane category. This affects quite a few of the higher end microlight aircraft that will now be classed as aeroplane.

I am aware that a 'Sport Pilot Category' has been talked about which may address this sector but I cannot find much about when that is likely to materialise - my gut fell is it wont be in time for 1 Jan 2008 and judging on how long these current regs took to promulgate, it may be some while before this category comes into being.

In the meantime, some will have to get their PPLs to remain legal.
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:52 pm

Just having a look at some of the aircraft that are affected by this weight limit. Below aircraft that will according to their published weights will be an aeroplane and not microlight:

A-22 Foxbat
Jabiru
Sting
Ikarus C42 (Club version)
Cheetah 912 versions
Skyrangers 912 & Jab versions

Suppose plenty more to add to the list.
User avatar
TouchNgo
Ready for the first flight
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:57 am
Location: Edenvale & Klipriver

Postby TouchNgo » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:32 pm

Skyranger 912 should make the cut off!

Ours came in at 259kgs with a 912 fitted.
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:16 am

That does lead to to the next question - will they use the kit manufacturers specifications or the actual weight of an individual aircraft?

Pros and cons either way.

I have a feeling if they follow the same route as TCA that it will be manufacturers spec.
User avatar
grosvenor
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Woohoo 100 posts - flying high
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Pietermaritzburg, KZN
Contact:

Re: Microlight Weight

Postby grosvenor » Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:29 am

skybound ® wrote:accordig to the new regulations for a 2 seater is:
MTOW=Empty weight + 2 Pax @ 84 kgs each + 22kg for fuel.
This has in fact never changed; in fact the current formula is more lenient. I still have the LS1 documents where it states that you will use 2 pax @ 90kg each and 22 kg fuel, i.e. EW = 248kg.

Somewhere along the line this seems to have been ignored by everybody incl. CAA since the arrival of the Jabiru 2 seater on the market.

As long as we see the Light Sport category get legislated soon, this should be no problem as it will then seperate the "real" microlight types from the more "aeroplane" types like the Foxbat, Cheetah, Sting, etc. Getting an MPL requires less training than an RPL, and hence the requirement for more basic aircraft.

Dave
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Re: Microlight Weight

Postby skybound® » Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:36 pm

grosvenor wrote:Somewhere along the line this seems to have been ignored by everybody incl. CAA.....
Quite correct , and they even ignored much of Part 24 since it was put into effect a few years ago via the special process in Part 11. But since 'proper' promulgation things as we know have changed somewhat.

With everything going on around us, my money is on the CAA not ignoring it for much longer.
User avatar
RV4ker (RIP)
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5386
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The Coves & FAVB

Postby RV4ker (RIP) » Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:59 pm

Devils advocate?
What will happen to those guys flying on MPL? Will they have to go PPl and when? I know plenty who are driving 912's on MPL and have no inclination that it is possibly under threat...

PS
What does a GT450 weigh and will it make the 450/260 cut off :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
User avatar
Tumbleweed
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:14 pm
Location: FASC

Postby Tumbleweed » Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:20 pm

GT 450 912S empty weight = 214 kg
max payload = 236 kg

The brochure concludes; Grand for touring, training, trophies. :)
User avatar
RV4ker (RIP)
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5386
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The Coves & FAVB

Postby RV4ker (RIP) » Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:26 pm

Is max payload limit because of 450kg's or lift ability/other? :wink:
4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:27 pm

RV4ker wrote:I know plenty who are driving 912's on MPL and have no inclination that it is possibly under threat...
I think that their reasoning may be twofold.

Firstly there is a feeling that it will be continue to be ignored and will only become an issue when someone eventually gets challenged on the issue - only then perhaps will we figure out that there is indeed an issue.

Secondly, I think that there may be a false sense of security in that there is this proposed Sport Category being talked about.

IMHO I think that this section is going to be pretty far away until it becomes a reality. There is a process to be followed - Out for comment, Carcom, gazetted for comment, translation into another language etc) One only has to look at how long current regulation making has taken and appreciate that we will be lucky if this new category makes it into our legislation before end 2009 or thereabouts (I am happy to eat my words if I am wrong :wink: ).

What do these pilots do in the meantime remembering the acid test of insurance. Forget if CAA or anyone else decides to enforce it - I bet your insurer will.
User avatar
RV4ker (RIP)
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 5386
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: The Coves & FAVB

Postby RV4ker (RIP) » Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:39 pm

Agreed. Worrying times, especially if you in wanting to buy a 912 for your newly started flight school.... :evil: :evil:
4 Sale (will trade)
P166S, Jodel, hangar and other odds and sods
Radial - http://tiny.cc/eppqp
Still @ The Coves (Harties) but dream has died
Weg
Learning to fly
Learning to fly
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:26 am

Postby Weg » Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:13 pm

skybound ® wrote:
RV4ker wrote: Secondly, I think that there may be a false sense of security in that there is this proposed Sport Category being talked about.

IMHO I think that this section is going to be pretty far away until it becomes a reality. There is a process to be followed - Out for comment, Carcom, gazetted for comment, translation into another language etc) One only has to look at how long current regulation making has taken and appreciate that we will be lucky if this new category makes it into our legislation before end 2009 or thereabouts (I am happy to eat my words if I am wrong :wink: ).

What do these pilots do in the meantime remembering the acid test of insurance. Forget if CAA or anyone else decides to enforce it - I bet your insurer will.
Skybound,
The details of the recreational pilots licence has already been gazetted - 27th amendment listed on the CAA website on the bottom right hand side under "gazetted amendments ....". So this is coming into effect 01 jan 2008.
User avatar
lamercyfly
Top Gun
Top Gun
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:56 am
Location: Durban
Contact:

Postby lamercyfly » Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:57 pm

Hi folk.

Yup, we know that the 27th amendment includes part 62, but so far I have not found any reference to LSA................

It is worrying to know that the fine system has now been promulgated...........Expect CAA to start showing her teeth in the new year...........

I would love to help with this LSA one, but my hands are full with microlights..............

later,
David Daniel
Email: lamercyfly@gmail.com
Mobile: +27 (0)746495744
User avatar
skybound®
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Postby skybound® » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:16 am

Weg wrote:Skybound,
The details of the recreational pilots licence has already been gazetted - 27th amendment listed on the CAA website on the bottom right hand side under "gazetted amendments ....". So this is coming into effect 01 jan 2008.
Weg if you believe the LSA is in there, please provide us some reference to it.

I cant find any reference to it in part 62 (or any other part). As far as I know, the regulations have not even been written yet, and it is only at a conceptual phase, where the motivation is being put together as to if and why we need such a category.
User avatar
Sonex711
Solo cross country
Solo cross country
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Kyalami, JHB

Postby Sonex711 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:33 am

Where's our fearless leader, mike2flyfar. I understood from mails I have that this is definitely in effect from 1 Jan 2008. Starting to get slightly worried...
Andrew
Savannah flyer
S25 55 54.80 E028 04 34.40
=D* =D* =D*

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests