Mandatory Transponder requirement

Matters of general interest
User avatar
John Boucher
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Dana Bay, Western Cape South Africa
Contact:

Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby John Boucher » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:11 pm

From AVCOM... Please note that we will shortly see the EXCO of Aeroclub posting here on Microlighters as well!!

We pertinently requested better communication between all the sections and of course AeroclubSA (^^) Also, have a look at their revamped website...
http://www.aeroclub.org.za/

http://www.avcom.co.za/phpBB3/viewtopic ... 11#p980811
The Aero Club of South Africa- the protector and preserver of free flight representing the 14 major Aviation sections in South Africa seems to need to promote all the work that it does and has been doing for years.
It seems another organisation that has been making a lot of noise patting itself on the back and taking credit for a lot of what AeCSA does and continues to do.
Prior to this our stance was to leave it alone - however with the directive of our members from our AGM we will become more vocal but in a positive and non agressive manner.

AOPA's Stellenbosh AGM a year back clearly spelt out how they view themselves and actively attempt to sideline all the other organisations seeing AeCSA, CAASA, SAPFA and EAA as competitors.
This seems strange - surely we all work towards the common goals.
The aeroclub does not see any other body or organisation as a competitor but rather as a respected partner and participant in directing our future.

See Extact.
"The growth of AOPA has been noted by both the authorities and our “competitors”, EAA,
SAPFA, Aero Club and CAASA. Earlier this year I was invited to attend a joint meeting at
Paddafontein in the Thabazimbi district where we founded the GACC, the General Aviation
Co-ordinating Committee. The representatives are myself, Paul van Tellingen and Frank
Eckard (SAPFA), Kevin Storie (Aero Club), Neville Bohm (EAA) Kim Gorringe (CAASA)
and Chris Marthinus (AOA). Since the formation we have had three meetings and we are
in regular contact. The question is often asked “Why so many alphabets?” In other words,
why so many organisations? I have come to learn that there is a need and a place for all of
them, most of all for AOPA. AOPA is the only truly independent representative body of
general aviation. All the others pay tribute to the authorities in some way or other. We
speak with our own minds and mouths. While I appreciate and applaud SAPFA’s efforts in
organising the PTAR and other events we need a specialised advocate for general aviation
and that is what we do."

So to this end to ensure that the aviation community is aware what AeCSA is doing on their behalf, we will be making regular submissions on the forums.
We are independent from the authorites but do believe most matters can be reolved with active communication and respect for the organisations we interact with.

We from now on will be "blowing our rather large 8000 member plus trumpet" on the forums for recreational and sport aviation in South Africa.

While we operate in a manner of consultation for proactive win-win initiatives with the SACAA, SAWS, ATNS and all other bodies, it must be realised that we are extremely active and while previously we were not keen to blow trumpets over many small matters that we have been involved with - it seems we must now do this. Du eto our extensive reach we oftenb nip matters in the bud way before the members ever get to to hear of them or feel any effect.
Some organisations have been a little over vocal on many matters presenting the impression that they are championing the causes but in reality they have been merely a partner in the cohesive efforts and team efforts from the various organisations such as Aero Club, CAASA, SAAF.

At Our AGM on Wednesday it was raised about the Mandatory Transponder requirement in the vicinity of Controlled airspace via the implementation of SA AIP ENR 1.6.2.3.2 which would threaten all recreational aviation.

SACAA was contacted in the very good spirit of active problem solving that AeCSA has with the various organisations such as CAA, DOT to ensure that our rights are protected.

The matter was resolved with out any need of legal threatening or posturing.

This was in reaction to:

“Kindly take note of SA AIP ENR 1.6.2.3.2 wrt the compulsory use of a serviceable mode A & C transponder within and within the vicinity of SA controlled airspace. Please ensure that all aircraft operating within your CTR are transponder equipped. If no code has been issued to them they must squawk A2000 or A2600 whichever applicable.

Kind regards,

Jan vd Linde

PM Bloemfontein

SACAA has stated the following to resolve the matter as they currently do in a constructive matter

See Extract below

"We will be issuing (if not done already) a NOTAM to hand correct the AIP which will remove the restriction.
We have also emailed ATNS to ask them to draw the attention of their ATSUs to the correction."

The Aero Club Newsletter will also be forth coming on Monday and will be a regular monthly emailed notification to members of matter we are working on and assisting our members with. We will post it on the forums as well.

We hope that the forum members will appreciate this new direction and we look forward to making you all aware of what the AeroClub of SA does do to preserve the freedom of flight.
Active since 1920 protecting your rights.
Last edited by John Boucher on Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
John Boucher
MISASA Chairman 2023
jb.brokers@gmail.com
chairman@misasa.org
A Bushcat is Born - CH 211 C "Super Excited" :evil:
User avatar
KFA
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2789
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:09 pm
Location: Now at Petit (FARA)
Contact:

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby KFA » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:35 pm

(^^) =D* =D* =D* =D*
Luck-The moment when preparation meets opportunity.
"Whether you think you can or you think you can't, you're right." -Henry Ford
"Opportunity Is Missed By Most Because It Is Dressed in Overalls and Looks Like Work." - Thomas Alva Edison
BUSHPILOTS FLY TAILDRAGGERS
Failure is not the opposite of success, it is the stepping stone for success
User avatar
zucac
Nothing beats flying
Nothing beats flying
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:01 am
Location: durban

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby zucac » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:16 pm

thank you John (^^)
User avatar
JvTonder
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1356
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:47 am
Location: Rhinopark

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby JvTonder » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:12 pm

=D* =D* =D* :lol: :lol:
Flying feeds the soul!
Jean Crous
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Barrydale Western Cape

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby Jean Crous » Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:47 pm

Although i have a personal dislike of meetings and paperwork, i applaud those individuals that "endure" this on my/our behalf to protect that which is dear to all of us............the freedom of flight (^^) (^^) (^^)
Thank you gentlemen , and lady :lol:
Jean.
The new front seat solo Cubby MK2 powered by Rotax 912 S 100hp
Cubby Aircraft Factory
Suppliers of Nitrate, Butyrate, adhesive, Fabric
Email: cubbyaircraftfactory@gmail.com
0726716240
Jean Crous
SACAA Approved Person 402
justin.schoeman
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: Pretoria

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby justin.schoeman » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:51 am

Just waking this thread up after an email from the EAA.

Look at this letter:

http://www.caa.co.za/NASCom%20Meetings/ ... ONDERS.doc

It seems this AIP was never withdrawn?
User avatar
John Boucher
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Dana Bay, Western Cape South Africa
Contact:

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby John Boucher » Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:34 pm

Serious stuff chaps...
Thanks for the concern and as it maybe it should be placed as a CLEAR and PRESENT threat to all recreational aviation

To place this a laymen’s understanding. This in addition to the Gauteng Airspace review underway at present.

The NASCOM proposal is for a CTA starting at 11500 ft going to 19500 ft

This is controlled airspace so transponders will be required.

ADD to this the plan to lower SA airspace in line with ICAO to FL 145 i.e. 14500 ft.

We promote SA filing a difference with ICAO as we unlike the rest of Africa have a valuable and avid recreational and sport aviation community

ADD to this the BUFFER zone which is automatically implemented by provision in the AIP that below and laterally around controlled airspace all aircraft will have to be transponder fitted
And along with this the recent the threat from SACAA to fine any aircraft that does not comply.

So what we ostensibly can have if this goes through in its current form, is that all airspace next to and under the CTA; and next to and under the CTR will be a buffer zone requiring mandatory transponder carriage.

It will affect all of us.

The big picture is that this will squeeze all forms of aviation into a smaller airspace making a safety risk and further more economically kill recreational aviation as in most cases transponders cannot be fitted unless at excessive cost and secondly most will cost as much as the aircraft they are flying.

Modern developments in tracking can be overlaid into the ATNS Eurocat system and give live real-time tracking could be the solution directly next to CTR but CTA must be excluded. This feed into Eurocat has always been possible but is not certified. There are many systems such as livetrack that use of simple cost effective units and cell phones to give live positioning information acceptable to FAI and for record purposes.

The other benefits of the cost effective systems not dissimilar to elts is that SANZAR search and rescue can also use these.

We as the aviation community do not want mandatory transponders and especially not over this proposed surface area.

In many regularly flown areas we believe can remain non tracked areas with no transponders or tracking and certain boxes or areas (as we have currently but may not be directly defined) with permanent activation that simultaneously no fly areas for Airlines. The airlines with PBN and GNAV etc can be routed past our areas rather than having an entire 80 NM area given over to the airlines.

We see this as theft of airspace

It seems that the little additions over time to AIP’s and other slipped in pieces of legislation when all activated and acted upon by the authorities shows the whole picture that we as AeCSA members cannot agree to which is the control of all airspace being class G or otherwise.

ATNS must spell out much more thoroughly their intentions and the actual impact which we believe they may be unaware of or are actually aware of and just hope we miss it.

This may require the amendment and correction of some erroneous regulations to stop this potential overall inhabitation of recreational and GA aviation.

The Meeting on the 7th at the OR TAMBO ATNS training centre is not merely a meeting but also a show of force so please make sure each section brings a 5 or more member contingent.

Sections must know where their affected operations are.
Their regular flying areas, XC sites and directions.
They must know their average flight heights and reasons as to why transponders cannot be fitted.
They must have info on other countries where this is not mandatory
They must insist upon their rights to fly near to their homes and limit costs.

This matter if not dealt with seriously will have effect on the future of recreational aviation.

Please can each section take this very seriously.

Please make sure your names and numbers are sent to Sandra to insure ATNS is ready.
John Boucher
MISASA Chairman 2023
jb.brokers@gmail.com
chairman@misasa.org
A Bushcat is Born - CH 211 C "Super Excited" :evil:
User avatar
Tumbleweed
Toooooo Thousand
Toooooo Thousand
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:14 pm
Location: FASC

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby Tumbleweed » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:13 pm

Am I right in understanding that the transponder proposal will be required only above 11 500 feet and max ceiling 14 000 feet?

You're mixing with JHB info and fast aerries so don't see the problem. I'd like Jhb info to advise me and others of someone who don't know where they are.

After 12 000 feet is oxygen levels anyway so who plays there?
Sling ZU FYE - For Your Entertainment
justin.schoeman
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: Pretoria

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby justin.schoeman » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:27 pm

Tumbleweed wrote:Am I right in understanding that the transponder proposal will be required only above 11 500 feet and max ceiling 14 000 feet?

You're mixing with JHB info and fast aerries so don't see the problem. I'd like Jhb info to advise me and others of someone who don't know where they are.

After 12 000 feet is oxygen levels anyway so who plays there?

The buffer zones are an issue. 5nm laterally will put a lot of smaller Gauteng airfields inside TMAs, and 2000' vertical - means max 6000' under the TMA...
User avatar
John Boucher
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Dana Bay, Western Cape South Africa
Contact:

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby John Boucher » Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:35 am

The devil is in the detail... Justin has it spot-on!

80nm and then those lateral and vertical limits imposed by the buffer zone!

This is serious stuff chaps - like it or not - it affects all recreational aircraft... microlights, lsa, gyro's, balloons, gliders, paragliders!!! :evil:
John Boucher
MISASA Chairman 2023
jb.brokers@gmail.com
chairman@misasa.org
A Bushcat is Born - CH 211 C "Super Excited" :evil:
justin.schoeman
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: Pretoria

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby justin.schoeman » Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:37 am

John - can you please confirm that the AIP is actually in force? This thread started with your post about the AIP being withdrawn, but the NASCOM letter seems to imply that this has been in place since 2011. If this is the case, I have been breaking the law just about every time I fly...
User avatar
John Boucher
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Dana Bay, Western Cape South Africa
Contact:

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby John Boucher » Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:51 am

It's one of those little AIP's hidden away in obscurity and has been in force.... :evil:

There is a technical committee meeting tonight and I will give feedback tomorrow of where we stand.

Justin, send me a mail to comms@misasa.org please...
John Boucher
MISASA Chairman 2023
jb.brokers@gmail.com
chairman@misasa.org
A Bushcat is Born - CH 211 C "Super Excited" :evil:
justin.schoeman
Frequent Flyer
Frequent Flyer
Posts: 1234
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: Pretoria

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby justin.schoeman » Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:05 am

And now the CAA wants to start enforcing this by means of fines? Miserable mother truckers...
User avatar
John Boucher
The Big Four K
The Big Four K
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Dana Bay, Western Cape South Africa
Contact:

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby John Boucher » Wed Jul 30, 2014 10:50 am

Ok Justin... so you seen the letter :-)
John Boucher
MISASA Chairman 2023
jb.brokers@gmail.com
chairman@misasa.org
A Bushcat is Born - CH 211 C "Super Excited" :evil:
User avatar
Luan
First solo
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Mandatory Transponder requirement

Postby Luan » Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:29 am

This is obscene! This has serious implications on feasibility of recreational flying. What can we as a community do against this?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests